Monday, April 4, 2016

How to Check Slab Foundations in Central Mississippi

A minimum foundation check should involve a complete floor elevation survey that should at least accurately describe the locations of the highest and lowest floor elevations. These descriptions should have enough detail so that anybody can locate those two points. It should include a calculation of apparent maximum differential movement which is the difference between the highest elevation and the lowest elevation corrected for any differences in floor thickness between those two points. I should note that these things have not always been done in the past. The average annual movement is computed with the age of the structure. This is a more important number than the apparent total differential movement.

Experience has shown that the average annual movement rate tends to continue unless repairs are made that specifically address the cause of the movement. A cookie cutter foundation repair that just involves releveling will not reduce the movement rate if the movement is heaving (upward) from expansive soils. Many of the foundation releveling procedures will help to retard settlements.  But many foundations have a mixture of settlement and heave. Some in central Mississippi are all heave. My view is that when the movement rate is over 1/4 inch per year you have a potentially serious foundation problem that probably includes significant heave. The worst case scenario is when the movement rate is 3/4 inch per year of maybe a bit higher. The 1/4 inch per year limit is strictly an arbitrary number. I assume that no one wants to have foundation repairs done any more often than once every 12 to 15 years. So over this time frame you can accumulate 3 to nearly 4 inches of differential movement with the 1/4 inch per year arbitrary limit. Total movements in this range is a limit that is often used in the real estate industry.

Experience has also shown that if you have an average movement rate of about 1/4 inch per year that a residence will begin to show damage when it is about 3 to 5 years old and that damage may first look like minor cosmetic issues. By the 5th or 6th year the damage begins to look more like it is related to foundation movements. So if you buy a house that is less than six years old it could have a fairly significant foundation issue that might only show up through a floor elevation survey. So for a rule of thumb in central Mississippi I recommend that if you are buying a house that is newer than say 6 or 7 years and does not show any evidence of foundation damage, the floor elevations should be checked and the average annual movement rate computed. A residence that may not need a foundation check would be at least 8 years old and show no damage that might be attributed to foundation movement.

I recommend a detailed foundation evaluation for any residence with 1/4 inch or more annual movement rate. The detailed check should include the minimum check requirements but also show floor elevations and contours plotted on a scaled floor plan. If the owner does not provide a scaled floor plan then the house has to be measured and a floor plan produced with those measurements. With a detailed check I like to show the lowest elevation equal to zero. Elevations are adjusted for different floor thicknesses. I show on the plan the base elevation survey measurement and the adjusted elevations, I then draw floor elevation contours typically at ½ inch intervals. In addition to recommending the kind of foundation repair, I may recommend checking the plumbing lines for leaks or soil borings. Generally I like to see these things done before I make recommendations for repair.

The benefit of the detailed foundation study is that it maps out the details of the movement. It shows what parts of the house have more slope than others and sometimes directs you to a serious problem like a broken plumbing line or an area with poor drainage. It is also important to look at how nearby larger trees are related with the movements.

Following this procedure it is possible that a newer house with minimum damage could be flagged because the movement rate is excessive. This does not mean that it has a foundation problem, but that it is at higher risk for future foundation problems. With a detailed study of the structure maybe a related drainage problem can be found and corrected. Also there are exceptions - not every structure with a high movement rate will continue to move at that rate and there is another issue in that not all structures with differential movement will result in wall cracks. It is rare but a structure can move so that it has an even slope across the whole structure (pure tilt). In this case the only damage is floor slope. Whereas there are no cracks, it does make the structure less usable if the slope becomes excessive.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

A Link to:What Happened Before the Big Bang

In my conclusions I state that: Scientists believe that a previous universe may have contracted to a point and then bounced to create a big bang and our universe. But I think that bounce cosmology is just a special case of all possible bang events that could occur when we consider quantum gravity in a multiverse environment. I think that if we want to consider all possible bang events in a multiverse where quantum gravity functions, we must also consider bang events from black holes that are equivalent to a contracted universe. So when we move bounce cosmology into a multiverse, another path to a bang becomes possible because the bounce occurs at some maximum density and that same density could eventually occur in a black hole if it obtains enough mass.

If you find this thought process interesting I invite you to read my complete blog at this address: